link to company text

Undermind YC '24

Undermind is an AI-powered scientific research platform used by researchers in biotech, pharma, and medicine to accelerate literature discovery, synthesize evidence, and generate reports. I was brought in to drive product strategy, UX systems thinking, and end-to-end design across a rapidly evolving product direction.

2026

Undermind YC '24

Undermind is an AI-powered scientific research platform used by researchers in biotech, pharma, and medicine to accelerate literature discovery, synthesize evidence, and generate reports. I was brought in to drive product strategy, UX systems thinking, and end-to-end design across a rapidly evolving product direction.

2026

CLIENT

Undermind AI

Role

Product Designer

Service

Product Strategy

CLIENT

Undermind AI

Role

Product Designer

Service

Product Strategy

CLIENT

Undermind AI

Role

Product Designer

Service

Product Strategy

Undermind
Undermind

Discovery

Discovery

The Challenge

Undermind's core technology was powerful but the product experience didn't match. Users struggled to understand what the tool could do, how to get started, and how to navigate between key workflows. The team needed design infrastructure — a way to diagnose problems, prioritize interventions, and ship meaningful improvements fast.

My Approach: Design Opportunity Pathways

Rather than jumping straight into screens, I first established a strategic framework: three parallel tracks that could run independently or together depending on team bandwidth and priority.

  • UX Diagnosis: A full audit of the product to surface friction points, map user flows, and build a shared vocabulary for design decisions going forward.

  • Redesign Flows: High-impact redesigns focused on usability, clarity, and engineering handoff — prioritizing user education and onboarding.

  • Design Bugs + Research Focus: Tactical UI polish, landing page refinement, and deeper research through personas, competitive analysis, and interviews.

This structured approach gave the team a clear menu of design investments with defined outputs at each level.

User Research — Personas, Needs & Discovery

I developed a research foundation anchored in five distinct user personas — Scientist, AI Research Engineer, Clinical Researcher, Academic Researcher, Graduate Student, and Technical Founder — each with distinct daily contexts, pain points, and goals.

From this I mapped:

  • Needs: Comprehensive understanding, cross-domain synthesis, rapid knowledge acquisition, idea refinement

  • Context: High stakes, time pressure, manual inefficiency, workplace performance pressure

  • Discovery channels: Peer recommendations, expert referrals, industry events — with conversion hinging on a critical "aha" moment

This grounded every design decision in real user motivation rather than assumption.

Competitive Analysis

I conducted a competitive analysis spanning the broader AI research ecosystem, focusing on three dimensions: Linear Flow, Project Ecosystem, and Navigation patterns. This surfaced conventions to respect, gaps to exploit, and informed how Undermind could differentiate — particularly in how it structures a user's ongoing research project vs. a one-off query.

Solution

Solution

Wireframing & Flow Design

Working across four design dimensions simultaneously — Preempt (landing), Linear Flow, Project Ecosystem, and Nav — I explored a wide solution space before converging. Key explorations included:

  • Dialogue approaches: One-shot animated vs. carousel onboarding prompts

  • Linear flow reform: From the current state to a restructured, hierarchy-first layout with clearer empty states

  • Project Ecosystem: Focused on surfacing hierarchy and empty states to reduce abandonment

Agent Experience Design

One of the most complex design challenges was communicating how the AI "agent" actually works — and what to do first. I designed multiple concepts for the library-building onboarding state:

  • Visualizations showing the relationship between Library → AI Expert → outputs (analyze, cite, draft)

  • Carousel-style contextual education (Examples / Feature Functionality) to reduce cognitive load

  • An empty state flow mapping: what happens when users land, what triggers notes or paper population, when to open agent chat

This work directly addressed the core learnability problem: users didn't know the tool's full capability or how to activate it.

Landing Page Audit

I conducted a structured audit of the existing landing page with annotated recommendations. Key findings:

  • Strong foundation — messaging and visual design mostly solid, no critical failures

  • Improvements needed: Tighten copy, reduce card text density, improve legibility and goal/value clarity

  • Strategic question flagged: Institutional login as a conversion blocker — worth resolving as consumer targeting scales

  • Positioning strength: "Thinks like a scientist" — a differentiator worth amplifying

Outcomes & Design Principles

Across 10 weeks and three major product pivots, I shipped:

  • A strategic design ops framework for the team to operate from

  • Persona + journey map research artifacts

  • Competitive analysis across the research tool landscape

  • Wireframe explorations across 4 key product surfaces

  • Agent onboarding concepts addressing the product's core learnability gap

  • Landing page audit with actionable, prioritized recommendations

Core principle throughout: Stay grounded in user data. Don't fall in love with a solution — fall in love with the problem.

What I'd Explore Next
  • Usability testing on the agent onboarding flows

  • A/B testing landing page copy variants

  • Deeper persona targeting as the consumer segment matures